Following testimony from Mrs. Samarco, her fellow employees, and even psychologists as expert witnesses, the Jury found that Mrs. Samarco was not subjected to the level of sexual harassment that she had claimed, and that she should not be awarded any damages stemming from her suit.
Much of Mrs. Samarco's testimony was undermined by other employees, who say many of the incidents had never occurred, and that a nickname she claimed was used against her was actually referring to another individual.
